29 Scientific Studies (and counting) that expose the ineffectiveness of Lockdowns. This is a beauty… ππΌ
π₯ Identification of the “Mink COVID Variant” in Denmark lead to the mass culling of Mink and for parts of the country to placed into Lockdown.
ππΌThis created the perfect well-powered and statistically relevant natural experiment to compare Lockdown vs Voluntary Measures in regards to measured infection rates using the clinically questionable PCR Test.
And what did they find?
- βOur study suggests that efficient infection tracing and voluntary behaviour is more important than actual mandates in controlling infectionβ¦ mak[ing] full lockdowns unnecessaryβ
- The number of Covid infections in the two groups was already falling before the onset of the heavy restrictions in the lockdown municipalities β and it keeps falling just the same in both groups.”
- Lockdowns donβt stop, slow down, or seem to affect the future spread of the disease in any way.
AIER wrote up a more accessible version of this technical paper, which you can find in the below commentππΌ
The original preprint MedRxiv paper can also be found in the comment belowππΌ
Lastly, AIER in concert with Ivor Cummins have documented 29 Papers that showcase the volume of empirical evidence against Lockdowns and associated mandates. Again, found belowππΌ
#FactsNotFear
- AIER write up of Danish Lockdown Study
- The original preprint MedRxiv paper, 4th Jan 2021
- 29 Studies Against Lockdowns
Enjoyed the read?Comment below, and check out our longer-formΒ Articles, our shorter Micro Blog sections, grab Healthy Meal Ideas from AdapNation Food Diary, and Free Gym Workout Plans at #HyperWorkouts. |
Leave a comment