I’d encourage you to read this piece with the British Medical Journal – not just the snippet 👇🏼
😳 Over the last two weeks, people have been sharing with me a significant number of media pieces observing anecdotal death and/or serious sickness after the COVID vaccines.
We’re talking about 20-30 pieces describing anecdotal situations from hospitals and individuals across the globe.
We HAVE NOT shared any of these media pieces. Why❓
Because we respect that it’s hyperbolic to infer vaccine injury and death without clinical proof. Just like it is also wrong to infer vaccine benefit without sufficient clinical evidence.
🕒 Only time will tell.
🙏🏼 That is, if the regulators, vaccine manufacturers, the Govt’s and the establishment media care for thorough investigations and honest reporting on vaccines.
What I find most odd is this…
🏆 The UK Govt and medical establishments are praised for their data transparency, reporting, and in recent times their scaled COVID testing, gene sequencing, and vaccine leadership. Apparently the MHRA are one of the best medical regulators worldwide.
❓So, why then has there been NO public data on UK Vaccine adverse reactions, serious adverse events, and deaths that need investigating due to their proximity to vaccination?
🤷🏻♂️ I don’t know the answer. But, considering we are rapid in sharing vaccinations completed, COVID patients, COVID ICU, and COVID death… why are we not leading the pack on Vaccine outcome transparency?
❓🇬🇧❓
What’s the deal with UK vaccine rollout and bad outcomes? – from this BMJ piece:
💬 “Asked if any deaths had occurred in UK patients after vaccination, the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said that details of all suspected reactions reported in association with approved covid-19 vaccines would be published along with its assessment of the data on a regular basis in the future”
#VaccineTransparency
_____
SOURCE:
🟢 BMJ PIECE: https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n149
Enjoyed the read?Comment below, and check out our longer-form Articles, our shorter Micro Blog sections, grab Healthy Meal Ideas from AdapNation Food Diary, and Free Gym Workout Plans at #HyperWorkouts. |
I have a suggestion.
Let’s treat the vaccines in the same way we treat positive PCR tests. If a person dies within 28 days of receiving it, then let’s classify it as a ‘vaccine death’ – sauce for the goose and all that.
OK somewhat tongue-in-cheek but, that Norwegian regulatory authority doctor did say “all these deaths were of people who were old, frail and with several serious co-morbidities” – or words to that effect. Now where have I heard that before?
So what’s killing them; the vaccine (virus) or the co-morbidities? or, as common sense suggests, is it a bit of both?
Hi Steve Katasi, it would surprise me a great deal to find that none of these deaths was caused by the vaccine!, the whole point of a vaccination campaign is to immunise a large enough cohort of fit healthy willing citizens so that an infectious disease cannot spread through the population and get to those that are most vulnerable!, this particular virus is having a devastating effect on a small cohort of mostly older but more importantly unfit people! all that cohort should be excludes from the vaccination effort!, the risk to them is always too high!. Cheers, Richard.